Desmume Rom Pokemon Soul Silver

The TAR Lecce ax to oil drilling

NEWS: THE TAR LECCE HAS GRANTED THE REQUEST FOR SUSPENSION Ostuni, Fasano REGION AND BY ORDER 130/2010.

for these reasons:

"Given that the town of Ostuni challenging the measures with which the Ministry of the Environment ruled positively on the environmental compatibility of the preliminary work on mining of hydrocarbons to the company Northern Petroleum Ltd. (UK) considered that the main action and acts of intervention appear to adiuvandum supported by reasons worthy of appreciation and protection for interim relief regardless of whether there is an imminent danger of prejudice resulting from the execution of measures challenged, finding application in this case, the precautionary principle that legitimizes the granting of interim protection in advance; noted that the process of environmental culminated in the adoption of measures that appear to have breached the ministerial's some considerable criticism given below : failed completion of the settlement procedure of the Committee technical verification of the environmental impact mercy convening of a representative designated by the Region of Puglia, with consequent failure to assess interest attributable to the territorial entity, failing to take account of the nature of the pollutant geophysical prospecting technique referred to as "air gun", particularly in relation to failure to take account of a technically viable alternative to the state of industry knowledge and sensitivity characteristics of the area where the activity takes place in question is not properly the adverse effects arising from the use of such methods in geophysical exploration for the protection of marine species (in particular, Mysticeti and Odontoceti) failure to take account of the prejudices that oil exploration activities in question may produce a load of productive activities through which it reflects the passion of the coastal area (activities of fishing, tourism, bathing etc.). PQM

welcomes the aforementioned application and supervision, to the effect, suspend the effectiveness of the measures challenged; This order will be executed by the Administration and is filed with the secretary of the tribunal who will notify the parti.Così decided Lecce in chambers on the day with the help of Judges 24/02/2010: Aldo
Ravalli, Presidente
Carlo Dibello, Primo Referendario, Estensore
Claudia Lattanzi, Referendario

Commento del Comitato “NO Petrolio, Sì Energie Rinnovabili”

Ancora una volta con l’interazione Istituzione - Comitato Cittadino si sono sconfitte le lobbies del petrolio.Il Comitato “NO Petrolio, Sì Energie Rinnovabili” esprime grande soddisfazione per la sentenza del TAR di Lecce che dà piena ragione al Comune di Ostuni per quanto riguarda la questione delle perforazioni per idrocarburi a largo delle nostre coste. Si è giunti a questa sentenza, dopo le innumerevoli iniziative No Oil organized by the Committee, involving civil society and awareness about the possible consequences, because of this reckless exploitation of the sea and land, could fall on local citizens. A working network of information and discussion, enriched by the sensibilities of people of culture and science, who sought to express their support for this mobilization, exposing himself, in order to contribute to safeguarding this is a territorio.Si JUDGEMENT OF SUBSTANCE which effectively cancels the permissions that the Environment Ministry, at the time, granted to the company Northern Petroleum.L 'order of the above is a great achievement for the protection of the natural pugliese.La ruling by the Tar Lecce is also an important step forward for law amministrativa.Questa win is a sign because it represents a more extensive protection of the environmental good even if the authorities responsible for its protection are not able of garantirla.Una landmark ruling that puts light on the environmental problem, has always shunned and mistreated, the tormented land of Puglia. All too often considered a land of conquest, whether in past centuries has left us a legacy admired by architectural and cultural heritage around the world, is in serious danger, in recent times to set aside the reasons that have attracted the attention of UNESCO. In times like those we live, characterized by harassment decision, the result of subtle international political agreements, it is obligatory for every citizen, commitment to, common goods like water, landscape and environment are tutelati.Il continuous transformation of nature, under the shots of the irresponsible exploitation of its resources by humans, directs us to the conclusion that it is necessary to abandon the search for new energy resources, extracted from fossil fuels, and addresses energy safer, in full harmony with the needs of the environment . In essence: - common goods such as 'water, the landscape, the' environment must be protected - you can still insist energy resources derived from fossil fuels, but we must aim for renewable energy, safe, clean and energy saving - there is no need for a 'sustainable economy, sustainable, in harmony with nature.

Ing Giuseppe DELEONIBUS

Committee Spokesperson "No Oil, On Renewable Energy"

How To Make An Aluminum Sinker Mold

Nuclear government appeals 'no laws' of Campania, Puglia and Basilicata

We are a party "bled" from the absence in Parliament and the media censorship, because it leads us uncomfortable topics below like nucleare.Non tolerate different voices from the official or the Minister Scajola Enel. Thus, the national president of the Greens, Angelo Bonelli has developed fast in front the Rai headquarters in Viale Mazzini, he does - ignore - 9 giorni.Il that the Government contests the laws for the NO to nuclear power is an act out of democracy, which is typical of the fascist regime, because it goes to deny the Constitution. Title V grants to the regions specific skills in certain subjects and fails to recognize this Scajola ruolo.E 'unprecedented severity of what happened in the last hour. The government, with the decision to challenge the regional laws of Puglia, Campania and Basilicata against nuclear power, has committed an act in repressive style. A gesture, that of Development Minister Claudio Scajola and Regional Affairs Minister Raffaele Lease, which goes back three decades. Clearly, for this ruling class that is not nulla il volere dei cittadini, che già nel 1987 si espressero contro le centrali nucleari nel nostro Paese; così come a nulla valgono le amministrazioni regionali, espressione della volontà popolare. Ma la decisione del governo Berlusconi di voler ricorrere contro le legislazioni regionali nasconde anche le paure delle forze politiche di maggioranza, che ancora non dicono chiaramente ai cittadini dove intendono costruire le centrali atomiche. Un timore evidentemente legato alla prossima scadenza delle elezioni regionali. Il governo Berlusconi sa bene che i cittadini sono contrari alla decisione di tornare al nucleare e, per questo, per il rischio di perdere consensi e scatenare proteste nelle comunità locali, si guarda bene dal rendere nota la lista dei siti. And as if this were not enough, the center has decided to impose the construction of plants with the use of the army. We are facing a very serious attack on democracy in our country, a complicit media system that has effectively obscured the issues of environment and removing them from the nuclear debate pubblico.I major television networks are silent in the face of government decisions and fail to their duty to inform. Minister Scajola, the protagonist of the last crusade in favor of nuclear power, must explain to the Italians where he intends to bring the nuclear waste is highly toxic and dangerous for hundreds of years. And how will you deal with, such as factories and technical quality. While Italian citizens are not given the opportunity to form an opinion on these events are crucial for the life of the country and for their health. Indeed, it has dropped a deafening silence on the issues that can damage the image of that majority and to question the choices. On nuclear power is no longer heard. Tell us what will be the positive effects of nuclear power, by keeping silent about the real costs of this operazione.Oltre to silence the very serious risks that we all run. And this interest. Behind us is an industrial system that wants to manage public procurement, and millions will dance here because there is political will on the plate a lot of money. Italians will be impoverished, because the bills increased the coverage. But the big households and industry lobbies of power will be more ricche.L 'Enel says nuclear power will create 300 thousand jobs ... But in Germany, where Merkel (as well as Obama in the U.S.) is betting on the energies of the future, there are 250 000 people employed in "sunny". Our country of the sun could be the leader of this clean energy, and instead will be in tow. We are squandering a treasure, we are denying the future. More generally, the government industrial policy - and it shows in the facts of Termini Imerese, in trouble all the companies in crisis - is producing only the unemployed and those smog.Oltre and the industry, this agrees with the French nuclear. They do not build new power plants for 35 years, But now they will make a big deal with Italy. In Rome it would say there beaks alone. We will support their economy, as the French Court of Auditors has certified the EDF 2 billion in debt, their energy agency. Part of that debt will pay the Italians because we supported them, who will place the reactor in our centrali.Dopo the dossier that shows how diseconomy nuclear energy than the others, they will pay the public costs, the Greens insist on a topic that touches the clear sensitivity of the Italians. We will inform everyone that 18 power stations in France are stuck on 56 for failure or accidents. History teaches us that an accident in a power plant can become a catastrophe planet. And so we will present a simulation of a nuclear accident in Montalto di Castro, where the government has already decided - but does not say - to return to the old regime centrale.Intanto, the Greens have drawn up a document point by point dismantling conveniences "nuclear "heralded by Scajola, the entire government, Enel. This is a dossier on nuclear power, the consequences of the arrival - in agreement with the government and trans together with EDF (Electricité de France) - the four nuclear reactors from 1.6 GW in French EPR technology. You read the concerns of Moody's, the best known and listed among the rating agencies, which includes an erosion of trust for businesses and industries involved in an affair so risky. Then there are the accounts of the MIT (Massacchussetts Institute of Technology in Boston) concludes that the enormous expenditure for a return to nuclear power. Disbursements that are usually spread over 15 years, covered with a mix of debt and equity, cost items that grow in nuclear power because of the length of construction time, the risk of delays 'political' (very high in Italy) and tecnici.Questo problems to an average cost of capital in the nuclear 10%, higher than that of other energy sources, at 7.8% is the main cause in the stagnation in the construction of new nuclear power stations in Western countries. Italy, however, is ready to leave, and masquerading as a business that Moody's ... is a simulation of the different options of energy production by including all costs, fixed, variable, financial charges, depreciation of equipment for dives lasting (30 years for gas, 50 years for nuclear). The result is an average price of energy (in dollars per megawatt-hour) of $ 120 for gas, 112 for coal, 125 for wind power, 151 x nucleare.La divaricherà trend even further this data because, as he writes Moody's "The nuclear issue is technical obsolescence and the cost continues to rise (and no one will upgrade to a disused park resources), while renewable technologies, by contrast, rapidly progressing towards increasingly efficient technologies e quindi verso una riduzione dei costi».E i modelli dell'agenzia si riferiscono a un Paese che produce nucleare, quindi rodato. Da noi si dovrebbe ripartire da zero, dopo 23 anni di messa al bando. Il governo ribatte che Enel - seconda utility europea - è un'azienza grande, capace di enormi investimenti. Vero, ma proprio Moody's nel 2008 ha declassato il livello di rating a lungo termine di Enel da A1 a A2. E il nucleare "declassa", come si è visto. I reattori - stando alle ultime commesse francesi in Canada - costeranno intorno ai 35 miliardi di euro. Enel dovrà indebitarsi, in una situazione che la vede già esposta verso il sistema bancario per 51 miliardi. Servono dunque garanzie, affinchè i partner finanziatori accettino il rischio. For this Enel has proposed establishing a priori the nuclear kWh price high enough to reward the financial institutions, when the plant will sell power.

This is the critical point of the Italian nuclear power, claims the dossier: impoverish the environment, the state coffers, the people's pockets.