answered a reporter off 
( nella foto Giuseppe Spalluto, cronista ) Sulla pagina personale Facebook del nostro Presidente cittadino, ing. Giuseppe Deleonibus, now is the following message:
" engineer what is the target which is aimed qndo makes his battles? How will combat such discrimination in the Democratic Party? Why does this happen, in his view? rumors are true that she advocated for the Democratic Party? But the face of these oversights, have changed his mind about certain changes of coat? Why change political calling on the eve of the first year as coordinator in the town green for peace? E 'sign of turmoil within your political circle? Respond to a mere chronicler 'discrimination' from the list of his friends on facebook just because the arrogance of politicians makes little minds polished facing criticism that some newspapers have reported on the actions come in the newsroom in press releases or through their actions .... Show tuttoLei banquet is to be always critical to any supervisor? Concrete answers and I hope maybe with a public press release. Joseph Spalluto "
This was the response of our national President, Eng. Deleonibus Joseph:
" Apart from his Italian embarrassing ... one by one answer to his points:
1) Target: No I have never set one. Have the targets is to me synonymous with limitations. I've always tried di guardare intorno a me e di trasmettere attraverso il mio bagaglio un quid in più. Il tutto in sintonia con la parola d’ordine contemporanea: ascolto, di sè e degli altri.
2) Non intendo contrastare queste discriminazioni...i pesci grandi hanno bisogno per crescere dei pesci piccoli. E' una lotta darwiniana, non manichea. La lotta omerica, nell'Iliade, avviene sempre tra eroi in possesso di una forza simile. Come insegna Esopo l'unico modo per sconvolgere il dato naturale della legge del più forte è l'uso dell'astuzia. Così lo scarabeo minuscolo fa cadere le uova della grande aquila arrogante dalla pancia di Zeus, per mezzo di astuzie; il piccolo Ulisse-Nessuno inganna il grande Polifemo, figlio di dio greco.
3) This happens because the Democratic strategy works on the idea of \u200b\u200ba single party! It is a strong idea and no matter if it fits poorly with the history of this country, where distances the contribution of those who want to remain free and therefore reduces the chance of winning the rights. No allies, only grooms! And who does not agree and is not to the 'mess' on many fronts and operating costs in environmental impact is undemocratic. These Directives, also valid for the local realities. Out of those who do not align, the free minds, who represents sensitivity and real needs, and opposes those who denounce the rulers of the concrete, the speculations of public-private monopolies, companies that do not respect the work.
4) I never advocated for the Democratic Party. I do not really reflect this Democratic Party. Especially as it is built in Monopoli. And who has ever spoken of my change of team? My only card was that of the Greens and the Greens will exist until (even with only 0.0001%) I will stay green. Especially now that a role of national importance (this is perhaps overlooked because little attention to the reading).
5) with respect to changes of team. Newspapers is often the subject of turncoats. It revolves around the issue, but the reality is simple: to be turncoats and character of the Italians, in their DNA. Among our quality and reliability no loyalty, History proves it in spades. Prevailing cynicism, prevalent attitude expressed by the usual "Who cares! 'El' even older, "but that if France or Spain magna. There are at least two books have appeared in recent years with the publisher Marsilio: an essay Pialuisa White ("Praise the turncoats') and a collection of interviews of Claudio Sabelli Fioretti (" turncoat, manual to float like a cork). We recommend you read. The change of jacket shows only the ability to cry out: "We want this, want that," as would "Peter". The change of coat is only a sign of weakness, extreme weakness or opportunism. When this
I will address the invitation to write about rivers of words but does not make the first allegations.
6) I never changed my policy. My first battle was the defense of homosexuals, as described by patients treated by a colleague. Battle that she knows very well. Then I officially met him walking in Piazza XX Settembre and my party I started to take their "defense". I would remind you, if he had forgotten why busy with other matters, the Green Party Monopoly was the first political organization to have access to institutions of citizen participation. Then I met in a non-official dealers in Piazza XX Settembre and are always at their side. To my deep knowledge of policy can safely read www.verdimonopoli.blogspot.com
7) Inside the circle there is no national turmoil. It works. Of course sometimes misunderstandings. But this happens everywhere. It will happen to her at Teletrullo on Channel 7 (which has provided the basics and now denigrates and attacks everywhere).
8) I have never discriminated against anyone. I can not afford it. I just deleted some people with whom I had no relations or intellectual affinity. And in that list of people it happened too. Although discrimination is no more than the legitimate exercise of the right to choose and therefore to exclude. Discrimination is not merely the legitimate right to have the sympathies and preferences and then to deny to others of our friendship or our solidarity. Discrimination is not merely a legal right not to accept an exchange. At the bottom is nothing but an act of freedom. It is perfectly natural. We do it every day. All. The right to discriminate is always legitimate? No. It is only when it will be respected and protected property rights of individuals. From what belongs to me, from my body, from the fruits of my work, my heritage, I have the legitimate right to exclude anyone. Imagine a world in which we are forced to have friends who do not wish, or perhaps to support people whose behavior we deeply indignant? Or simply people with whom, for some reason, however rational and sensible it is, you want to have nothing to do? We are confident that such a world is a world of freedom? I think not.
9) The criticism of some newspapers (actually just her) I have not read. In the sense that your articles I do not I have experienced as criticism. But as those words ... those without a precise sense just to remove the opponent (and yes because she lives like this. I do not. She to me is just a writer, or a writer. Let me not to call journalist otherwise the deans will be offended. And also because in Italy to carry out the activities of the journalist - regulated by law (the Number 69 of 1963) and based on a specific ethics - should be part of an appropriate professional body. And you, that I know still not a member). But let me advise you, however, yet another reading of the Charter of duties of the journalist "(signed by the National Council of the Order of Journalists and the National Federation of the Italian Press on July 8, 1993).
10) What does each supervisor to be critical? Criticism is one thing that a politician has to get used to. I endorse what he said Otto von Bismarck "I accept with gratitude the harshest critics, if only remains impartial." Juvenal said, "The criticism is indulgent with crows and rages with the doves." To be more within his reach, my grandmother said, "It's easy to speak ill of art, but it is difficult to learn."
Absence of Malice and right are both emanations of critical art. 21 of the Constitution, however, their diversity is enormous. The chronicles of a phenomenal reality (fact or behavior). Since information is objective. The criticism, as evaluation is subjective. The critique is basically an attack. And 'the subjective assessment to characterize the criticism of the news. If it is to report an objective fact, you can give it to an informational message only. The possibility of criticism of a fact, however, tend to endless. In theory, the critics should meet the same limits for the freedom of the press: truth, public interest, formal continence. Only if it meets all three requirements of the criticism is legitimate. The truth is related to the fact: that criticism must be based on false foundations. Must be of public interest, which is then referred to the same fact: you can not, therefore, to express publicly critical assessments on private facts or without any interest to the community. Finally, the criticism must comply with the formal requirement of continence. In theory, in fact. But in practice, the difference of identity with the record makes it impossible to criticize the traditional requirements apply to the same extent and con la stessa severità. Non è difficile immaginare come la valutazione di un fatto, passando attraverso la sua interpretazione, possa tendere a travisarlo. E come la critica verso una persona, o un suo comportamento, per forza di cose finisca per rappresentarla in maniera diversa da quella che è.
11) La risposta è pubblica e non penso per questo di doverle un comunicato stampa.
Non esiste saponata per lavar l'anima ingrata ".
